Move the sliders, pick your tax regime (new or old, FY 2026-27), and see how much more of the same return stays with you in a SIF versus PMS and AIF Cat-III — on your corpus, your assumptions, your holding period.
Adjust to your situation. Results update live.
The four wrappers carry materially different tax and cost structures. Here is exactly how each post-tax CAGR is computed:
The formula assumes a single hold-and-exit at the end of the period. Real portfolios churn — which makes the wrapper differential more pronounced for slab-rate vehicles, not less. Calculator output is illustrative; actual outcomes depend on fund-specific cost, churn, sequence of returns, and individual tax circumstances.
India's new tax regime is the default since FY 2023-24, and most HNIs are now on it. The single difference that matters for this calculator is the surcharge cap: under the new regime the maximum surcharge is 25%, so the top marginal rate is 39% (30% × 1.25 × 1.04 cess). The old regime retains a 37% surcharge band above ₹5 crore of income, taking the top rate to 42.74%. Toggle the regime above to apply the correct effective rate to the slab-taxed vehicle (AIF Cat-III); SIF, MF and PMS gains use capital-gains rates regardless of regime.
SIFs inherit Section 10(23D) fund-level tax exemption — gains compound untaxed inside the fund and are only taxed at investor-level redemption at LTCG rates. PMS gains are taxed in your hands as capital gains year by year as holdings are sold. AIF Cat-III is taxed at the fund level at slab plus surcharge. Over a 10-year hold for a top-bracket investor, that difference against AIF Cat-III can compound to roughly ₹70–80 lakh per crore of allocation (against PMS the model gap is smaller, around ₹30 lakh, because PMS gains are taxed at capital-gains rates as they are realised) — the exact figure depends on your regime, bracket and the funds chosen. This is an illustrative model, not a forecast.